NMCC
2005 (495-509)
Members:
Mr Fergus Hood (Chairman) [FH] Mr Alexander Buchan [AB]
Mr Mike Taylor (Secretary) [MT]
Mr Robert Loughridge
[RL]
Mrs Fiona Duncan (Treasurer) [FD] Mrs Moira Lee [ML]
Prof Roy Bridges (Minute Sec.) [RB]
Mr Graham Geddes [GraG]
Mr Gordon Murray [GM]
In attendance ex officio: Councillor Dr Martin
Ford [CllrF]
Abbreviations: AC =
Aberdeenshire Council; NMCC = Newmachar
Community Council
Apologies were recorded for: Mr Gordon Murray
In attendance as visitor(s): Mr Richard Page
Minutes
The Minutes of the
meeting held on
495. Youth Project (See
Minute 489)
(i) In view of Mr Ewan Smith’s
continued indisposition, Ms Amanda Hampton had taken
responsibility for Community Education’s youth work in Newmachar
ii) The portacabin due to be
erected had been accidentally destroyed by RB Farquhar Ltd but an alternative wou8ld be provided. £10,000 needed to be spent on the project before the end of March or the
funding would be lost.
496. Road
Gritting (See Minute 492 viii)
Mr Tom Mitchell had written on the
possibility of employing local farmers to keep unclassified
rural roads open. AB would respond
giving NMCC’s views
497. Library
Hours (See
Minute 492 vii)
Mr Gerald Moore of AC had
responded to NMCC’s request for restoration of the Library hours by saying funding problems made this
impossible. NMCC resolved to keep this matter alive and CllrF
promised to find out about the possibilities of a later review.
498. Police
Matters
FH reported that he had consulted Inspector Pratt
about a spate of window breaking and
damage to the Christmas decorations.
More patrols were promised on Friday and Saturday
nights and a continued clamp down on under-age drinkers and troublesome under 12s.
499. Community
Hall (See
Minute 488)
(i) Note was taken of the record
made by ML at the meeting of 29 user groups. (Copy attached to the principal copy of these minutes.)
(ii) GraG reported that an
architect had been helping with the planning of a possible new community hall but it was
unreasonable to expect the investment of great time and effort unless it were certain that the project would go ahead.
(iii) FH and GraG pointed out that the alternative
Community School option could not be
delivered at best until five years had passed; that it would probably not be
able to deliver the possibility of
three or four uses going on contemporaneously; and that it could not deliver all that the user groups had pointed
out as being desirable from their
various points of view.
(iv) NMCC noted that AC’s
Twenty-First Century Schools Improvement programme allocated £9.2m to
(v) It was reported that a
‘stakeholder’ consultation on the School would be held in February; AC would then write to
everyone and circulate the forms for an indicative ballot. Subsequently, a new
consultative meeting would be held.
(vi) On connected planning gain
issues, see Minute 503 (ii), below.
500. Garioch
Area Plan 2004-2007
NMCC noted the Plan and the
invitation from the Area Manager to offer comments and additions. It
was agreed to mention Monykebbock Burial Ground, the Straloch Mausoleum, business facilities at Kingseat,
the extension of health care facilities and sites
for the School all as detailed in the reponse reproduced as the Addendum to
this Minute, below.
501. Garioch Forum (See Minute 486)
The report on the meeting of
(i) Good information was provided
on Scottish Water plans etc; they are willing to meet community councils;
(ii) There is now website access
to all planning applications and plans can be downloaded;
(iii) The Forum’s report on
planning procedures was finalised and will be widely circulated;
(iv) Objections to the complete
closing of roads for minor repairs etc would be passed on to relevant committees of Aberdeenshire Council.
(v) The Association of Scottish
Community Councils was reported to be seeking, inter alia, direct
funding for community councils from the Scottish Executive and a unified scheme for community councils
for the whole of
502 Lock-up
Garages (See Minute 482)
NMCC found it needed more
information on what uses were possible under AC rules for presently unused garages; CllrF promised to
investigate.
503. Kingseat (See Minute
490)
(i) CllrF reported that the
Section 75 Agreement had been signed and planning permission given by AC.
However, one wayleave problem remained.
(ii) It was confirmed that,
potentially, there was available for possible Community Hall Project use £95K plus £50K
‘compensation’ for Kingseat United FC’s ground (which would have to be used for sports facilities). This, plus the £19K already available from the
504. Church
Extension (See Minute 491)
It was noted that the
505.
(i) Mr Richard Page was invited to
explain his worries about the latest plans which he understood to involve a new route for the A947 from the
Swailend turning to Parkhill. He and his neighbours at Little Goval
would be adversely affected by a proposed new roundabout
and by an apparent failure to take into account existing roads and access points in the vicinity.
(ii) CllrF said that the plans were a Scottish
Executive affair and AC was not officially aware
of what was going on. Moreover the
Scottish Executive did not need planning permission
from AC. The Executive had promised a
briefing on 3rd February. [It
was subsequently learned that the
briefing would be postponed.]
(iii) Mr Page was invited to put his views in
writing so that NMCC could decide how to
act.
(iv) CllrF remarked that the timetable for the WPR
and connected projects like the one
under discussion was slipping and he doubted whether 2010 was achievable.
506. Aberdeenshire
Council Matters
(i) Closing of roads (Minute 492 x). The response to the Garioch Forum’s representations will be awaited.
(ii) Provision of walkways on
(iii) Budget Briefing papers 5, 6,
and 7 were available. CllrF said the
financial position of AC was
difficult but not horrendous.
(iv) The Executive’s auditors had made a good
report on AC’s efficiency.
507. Request
for Minutes and Visit to Scottish Parliament (See
Minutes 493 & 494)
RB reported on his visit where he
had raised questions about the status and standing of community councils.
Mrs Milne MSP had been provided with NMCC minutes as she had requested but there was no
discernible result.
508. Web
Site
Following Mr Dave Lee’s suggestion
that the NMCC web site should be revamped
and include pages for
various local organisations in addition to NMCC itself, it was agreed that a new webmaster should be
advertised for in the next issue of the Newsletter. If someone
were forthcoming, the whole question could be aired again.
509. Correspondence
(i) It was noted that Mr Fowell would attend the
April meeting of NMCC. Further communications
were noted as received: (ii) Grampian Fire Board; (iii) Wind Energy Development Policy (RB to report); (iv)
Aberdeenshire Sports Council; (v) Co-operative Group
Committee Structure (RB to report); (vi) Rights of Appeal in planning matters (RL to report).
There being no
further business, the meeting was declared closed at 2130
The date of the next meeting was agreed as
Addendum to Minute 500: the Response to the Garioch
Area Plan from NMCC
GARIOCH AREA PLAN 2004-2007
The attached plan
was approved by the Garioch Area Committee on
1. What other current actions or
projects should have been included?
In the
Sustainable Environment section, the Community Council would have expected
there to be some mention of two heritage-connected projects which we assumed,
following our submissions, that Aberdeenshire supported. These are the repair and maintenance of the
Monykebbock Burial Ground and the Straloch Mausoleum in the
Under
Jobs and the Economy, the Community Council would have expected to see some
reference to the provision of business facilities as part of the Kingseat
development.
(Cont.-)
2. What suggestions do you have for next
year’s plan?
Under
Community Well-Being, it would be sensible to plan to extend and improve the
facilities for health care in Newmachar, especially in view of the likely
increase in population as the Kingseat housing project gets under way.
With
further reference to the question of business facilities as part of the
Kingseat project, the Community Council points out that the building of the
Northern extension of the
Given
its concerns about the refurbishment, rebuilding or replacement of the present
3. How readable and user friendly did
you find the document?
The
map on page 2 of the Plan document is very poor and inadequate but, otherwise, the
presentation is attractive. The
arrangement of the material seems generally sensible and the prose style
acceptable. There is a split infinitive
at one point and the syntax in the preamble to this questionnaire form is not
above reproach but many public documents these days are much worse in such
respects.
NAME OF COMMUNITY
COUNCIL: Newmachar Community Council
Completed Forms
should be returned to: Ian Fowell, Area Manager, Gordon House,
***************************************
[1] Retention of existing School building; refurbishment of the existing School without community option; refurbishment with community hall added; build new school on existing site without community hall; new school with community hall; a new school on a new site without community hall; new school on new site with community hall.